2013 Annual Oil and Gas Law Update
James B. Lebeck, Proceedings of 59th Annual Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Institute (2013)
This chapter summarizes significant statutory, regulatory, and common law developments concerning many aspects of upstream oil and gas development in the United States that have occurred during the last half of 2012 and the first half of 2013.
§ 10.02 Mineral Title
[a] Nicholson v. Upland Industrial Development Co.1
The Supreme Court of Arkansas held that a deed reservation for “mineral deposits” properly reserved the rights to oil and gas pursuant to the Strohacker doctrine. …
[b] Staggs v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.5
The Supreme Court of Arkansas held that the factual analysis required by the Strohacker doctrine is only necessary for periods when it was uncertain if the term “minerals” included rights to oil and gas.6 …
 North Dakota
[a] Estate of Christeson v. Gilstad10
The Supreme Court of North Dakota held that a lease did not have to be executed by the owner of record to qualify as “use” pursuant to North Dakota's dormant mineral statutes.11 …
[b] Reep v. State17
The trial court granted partial summary judgment to the State of North Dakota, concluding that the state owns the minerals under the land between the ordinary high and low watermarks on the navigable waterways at issue. …
[a] Butler v. Charles Powers Estate19
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that the Dunham Rule--pro
This content is available from the following sources
Already a Subscriber? Sign In
Over 60 years of scholarship at your fingertips.
Buy the Publication
The book containing this article may be available in hard copy, or the article may be available individually. Please contact the Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation at email@example.com or 303-321-8100.